Peace Of Mind Is A Beautiful Thing!
Preparing for the future. Preparing for the unexpected. What does it take to prepare adequately for your future and to feel financially secure and peace of mind? What are your goals and dreams? It can be overwhelming.
To effectively build your financial stability and future, it takes solid financial planning, sound advice, involvement, and education. iWealth Consulting Services works closely with you to help determine your financial goals, to help you on your quest to achieve your dreams, and to help calm your fears about planning for your retirement. We help you understand many of the different aspects of retirement planning and estate planning.
Do you know what will happen if you pass on without a WILL?
Your assets will be frozen which means that your loved one and children will have cash flow problem because your savings will be frozen.
It will be a lengthy and costly legal process
and your assets will be distributed according to the Distribution Act.
Your children’s welfare may not be taken care of
by the right person…
So, write a Will today and be peace of
mind!
For a complimentary consultation,
please contact our Will & Trust Advisor.
You will agree that your family’s future is worth a few minutes of your
time.
How Can Life Insurance Become the Best Legacy You Can Leave to Your Family?
When it comes to planning for you and your family's financial stability in the future, the best time to do it is now. For most bread-winners, it is an upmost priority to ensure that they can provide the basic needs for their family. But in an event that a family's provider would untimely pass away, there is no doubt that the surviving family members will be financially crippled. One of the best ways of at least to financially prepare your family and to somehow cope up with the family's main source of income is for the provider to purchase a life insurance.
Basically, a life insurance is a form of agreement between an individual and an insurance company wherein a set of premium would be purchased. In turn, they will guarantee that they will provide a large amount of money for your beneficiaries by the time the provider passes away. With the help of the money that the surviving members will receive, will somehow provide the financial compensation for their loss.
However, a life insurance is not just a mere financial compensation for the loss of a family's provider. To further understand how life insurance works for you, here are the examples:
-First and foremost, it functions as a protection for your family's financial stability as well as their lifestyle. With the loss of the family's income provider, it is less likely that the family can still continue the current lifestyle. Through this type of insurance, one can rest assure that the family that may be left behind can live a comfortable life.
- Secondly, it can prepare your family's life events. For instance, you can purchase a life insurance that may potentially cover the financial needs. An example of such instance is for your children's tuition cost for college of the family when you are gone.
- The third purpose may be as an investment vehicle. When you purchase a life insurance, it can become a risk-free investment to such that your money could potentially turn into a large amount in cases of untimely death that may be enough take care of the family.
- The fourth use is to be a key man insurance because it will protect you, your partner as well as your business. In cases that a business partner passes away, this insurance could be used to ensure that the surviving family members will have enough money to buy the share of the business thus maintaining the same income even if the original provider may no longer be around.
- Lastly, this can be used as a charitable giving as well as inheritance. If ever you have a loved one or a charitable institution you want to share what you have when you pass away, then this is the best option to take. You can purchase a life insurance and have the charitable institution or a loved one as the beneficiary. From here, you can leave them a legacy from the money you have earned.
With the different purposes of availing a life insurance identified, the next thing left to do is to look for the right insurance company that can best provide you with a premium that best fit your budget, plans as well needs.
Basically, a life insurance is a form of agreement between an individual and an insurance company wherein a set of premium would be purchased. In turn, they will guarantee that they will provide a large amount of money for your beneficiaries by the time the provider passes away. With the help of the money that the surviving members will receive, will somehow provide the financial compensation for their loss.
However, a life insurance is not just a mere financial compensation for the loss of a family's provider. To further understand how life insurance works for you, here are the examples:
-First and foremost, it functions as a protection for your family's financial stability as well as their lifestyle. With the loss of the family's income provider, it is less likely that the family can still continue the current lifestyle. Through this type of insurance, one can rest assure that the family that may be left behind can live a comfortable life.
- Secondly, it can prepare your family's life events. For instance, you can purchase a life insurance that may potentially cover the financial needs. An example of such instance is for your children's tuition cost for college of the family when you are gone.
- The third purpose may be as an investment vehicle. When you purchase a life insurance, it can become a risk-free investment to such that your money could potentially turn into a large amount in cases of untimely death that may be enough take care of the family.
- The fourth use is to be a key man insurance because it will protect you, your partner as well as your business. In cases that a business partner passes away, this insurance could be used to ensure that the surviving family members will have enough money to buy the share of the business thus maintaining the same income even if the original provider may no longer be around.
- Lastly, this can be used as a charitable giving as well as inheritance. If ever you have a loved one or a charitable institution you want to share what you have when you pass away, then this is the best option to take. You can purchase a life insurance and have the charitable institution or a loved one as the beneficiary. From here, you can leave them a legacy from the money you have earned.
With the different purposes of availing a life insurance identified, the next thing left to do is to look for the right insurance company that can best provide you with a premium that best fit your budget, plans as well needs.
Planning for retirement
Only 34% of Malaysians putting aside money regularly for retirement
funds
YOUNG parents Xavier Arumugam and Kavitha Nair has been putting aside a fixed sum every month into their savings accounts as part of their retirement nest egg after deducting expenses for the household, medical insurance as well as education plans for their children and house loan installment.
Both of them had also voluntarily increased their employees contribution to 15% for the Employees Provident Fund (EPF) compared to the usual contribution rate of 11%.
“We are aware though, that we do not have a formal retirement plan in place
besides the EPF,” Kavitha admits.
According to Great Eastern Life Assurance (M) Bhd executive vice-president and chief marketing officer Loke Kah Meng, only 34% of Malaysians are putting aside money regularly for their retirement funds, but these may not take into account inflation, the rising cost of living and medical expenses in future, which could be a major financial burden.
“Although EPF savings is one of the main channels to provide for retirement, 99.9% of the contributors would withdraw their EPF savings in one lump sum once they reach 55 years of age and 70% of them would use up all their EPF savings in just three years post-retirement,” Loke notes.
Loke adds that longer life expectancy, delayed marriage and having children later would leave the retirees in a vulnerable position in their old age as they need to need to set aside medical funds for themselves and education funds for their children.
Meanwhile, Prudential Assurance Malaysia Bhd chief marketing officer Thomas Wong, survey findings shows that although Malaysians have a high propensity to save (72% claimed that they do save for retirement), 41% do not have a concrete plan on how to build their retirement fund.
“They just save as much as they can now and hope they will have enough to cover their retirement needs,” Wong says. Wong adds that among those who save for retirement, 77% are putting their money in low-yielding savings vehicles such as bank fixed deposits and savings accounts to accumulate their nest egg.
“Contrary to the common belief that keeping our money in the bank is the best way to preserve our capital, this instrument may not be good enough given that interest rates of bank deposits can hardly outrun inflation,” Wong says.
He also notes that most Malaysians do not segregate their savings for retirement, which made matters worse.
“This means, all their monies are lumped together as general savings. More alarmingly, out of those who consciously separate their savings for retirement, 83% have said that they would use the money should other needs arise,” he says.
This is indeed a risky situation because if they are not careful, they may not have enough money for their retirement, Wong explains.
In addition, a staggering 73% do not seek advice from financial professionals – a behaviour that compounds Malaysians’ poor retirement planning ability further.
“All these could probably explain why about 39% of those surveyed see themselves working beyond the mandatory retirement age, citing income boost as the main reason for doing so,” Wong adds.
Loke advises that instead of relying solely on one’s EPF and personal savings, Malaysians should consider early financial planning, which would save them the stress of dealing with insufficient retirement funds or seeking prolonged employment to ensure financial stability.
“We could plan ahead with investment-linked insurance plans to counter the effects of inflation. In addition, there is also the need to consider providing for your medical needs after you have retired and would be no longer entitled to medical coverage provided by your employer,” Loke says.
Meanwhile, Wong advises that there are a variety of choices available when it comes to building your retirement fund.
“Depending on your risk appetite, investment horizons and affordability, you can invest in properties, equities, unit trusts and investment-linked insurance to name a few. The key is to have a sound investment strategy that is the ability to balance risks and returns effectively according to the desired investment tenure,” Wong says.
Nevertheless, it is always advisable to contact a professional financial advisor or a wealth planner who can provide advice on how to best go about securing your retirement based on your financial circumstances, priorities and needs, Wong adds.
- Source from The Star, 4 April 2009 by Lalitha Hunt
YOUNG parents Xavier Arumugam and Kavitha Nair has been putting aside a fixed sum every month into their savings accounts as part of their retirement nest egg after deducting expenses for the household, medical insurance as well as education plans for their children and house loan installment.
Both of them had also voluntarily increased their employees contribution to 15% for the Employees Provident Fund (EPF) compared to the usual contribution rate of 11%.
![]() |
| Loke Kah Meng ... 99.9% of the contributors will withdraw their EPF savings in a lump sum and 70% will use up money in 3 years. |
According to Great Eastern Life Assurance (M) Bhd executive vice-president and chief marketing officer Loke Kah Meng, only 34% of Malaysians are putting aside money regularly for their retirement funds, but these may not take into account inflation, the rising cost of living and medical expenses in future, which could be a major financial burden.
“Although EPF savings is one of the main channels to provide for retirement, 99.9% of the contributors would withdraw their EPF savings in one lump sum once they reach 55 years of age and 70% of them would use up all their EPF savings in just three years post-retirement,” Loke notes.
Loke adds that longer life expectancy, delayed marriage and having children later would leave the retirees in a vulnerable position in their old age as they need to need to set aside medical funds for themselves and education funds for their children.
Meanwhile, Prudential Assurance Malaysia Bhd chief marketing officer Thomas Wong, survey findings shows that although Malaysians have a high propensity to save (72% claimed that they do save for retirement), 41% do not have a concrete plan on how to build their retirement fund.
“They just save as much as they can now and hope they will have enough to cover their retirement needs,” Wong says. Wong adds that among those who save for retirement, 77% are putting their money in low-yielding savings vehicles such as bank fixed deposits and savings accounts to accumulate their nest egg.
“Contrary to the common belief that keeping our money in the bank is the best way to preserve our capital, this instrument may not be good enough given that interest rates of bank deposits can hardly outrun inflation,” Wong says.
He also notes that most Malaysians do not segregate their savings for retirement, which made matters worse.
“This means, all their monies are lumped together as general savings. More alarmingly, out of those who consciously separate their savings for retirement, 83% have said that they would use the money should other needs arise,” he says.
This is indeed a risky situation because if they are not careful, they may not have enough money for their retirement, Wong explains.
In addition, a staggering 73% do not seek advice from financial professionals – a behaviour that compounds Malaysians’ poor retirement planning ability further.
“All these could probably explain why about 39% of those surveyed see themselves working beyond the mandatory retirement age, citing income boost as the main reason for doing so,” Wong adds.
Loke advises that instead of relying solely on one’s EPF and personal savings, Malaysians should consider early financial planning, which would save them the stress of dealing with insufficient retirement funds or seeking prolonged employment to ensure financial stability.
“We could plan ahead with investment-linked insurance plans to counter the effects of inflation. In addition, there is also the need to consider providing for your medical needs after you have retired and would be no longer entitled to medical coverage provided by your employer,” Loke says.
Meanwhile, Wong advises that there are a variety of choices available when it comes to building your retirement fund.
“Depending on your risk appetite, investment horizons and affordability, you can invest in properties, equities, unit trusts and investment-linked insurance to name a few. The key is to have a sound investment strategy that is the ability to balance risks and returns effectively according to the desired investment tenure,” Wong says.
Nevertheless, it is always advisable to contact a professional financial advisor or a wealth planner who can provide advice on how to best go about securing your retirement based on your financial circumstances, priorities and needs, Wong adds.
- Source from The Star, 4 April 2009 by Lalitha Hunt
Is savings enough for retirement?
Retirement may not be the foremost concern for young adults in the prime of their lives. But that does not mean they are oblivious to the fact that they may need to have financial reserves for a rainy day.
FOR many young adults, retirement is not something they are thinking about at this stage of their lives. Those who have been working for less than 10 years have only recently begun to establish their careers, so foremost on their mind would be working to achieve success in their respective vocations.
For them, life still has a lot to offer, and the process of winding down an active lifestyle and retiring is, quite simply, not high on their list of things to do.
According to the findings of the AXA Retirement Scope 2010, a global retirement study conducted across 26 countries in Europe, the United States and Asia, the percentage of the Malaysian working population who have started preparing for their retirement has declined from 48% in 2007 to 38% in 2010. The study also shows that among the 38% who have started to prepare for retirement, most of them did so only at or near age of 40. Meanwhile, 46% said they would start to prepare for retirement when they hit 50.
Among the young, only one in five has started to prepare for retirement. Most of them do plan to start but rather late, at age 46.
Take for example, Anusya Sree, 28, who got married late last year.
“Retirement is not something I am thinking about at the moment; and isn’t it a negative thought with so much yet to do? I am only just experiencing life as a married woman. I am looking forward to spending many happy years with my husband and raising a family of our own,” says the bank executive.
For Anusya, her priority now is to ensure she has a successful career.
“I have been working for five years, and am enjoying the thrill of being an independent working adult. I have not even decided when I will have children, much less when I will retire.”
Similarly for Nicole Tan, 26, a producer for an online travel web portal, retirement is not high on her list of priorities at the moment.
“No, I have not started planning. I would like to build up my career so I have a good platform from where I can start planning for retirement. I am saving up to buy my first property, if that counts.”
However, she is aware that having sufficient funds in her retirement years will require a large amount of money.
“It would be an astronomical amount. I am not capable of reaching even 10% of it at the moment,” says Tan.
Findings of the AXA Retirement Scope 2010 survey confirm the general perception that only 14% of the Malaysian working population know exactly how much their retirement income should be.
However, not all young adults are focused on the here and now.
Badrulsyah, 35, for example, started planning for his eventual retirement five years ago.
“It is vital for one to start planning early. I learnt that if you leave it to the last minute, you will not have enough time to build up sufficient funds.
“I also know I cannot count on EPF savings alone. After making withdrawals to buy a house, for example, there is even less money to last through the retirement years,” says the self-employed entrepreneur.
The AXA Retirement Scope 2010 survey findings show that the working segment’s (especially young and mid-life) level of confidence in their own amount of retirement income suffered a big drop from 2007. Only 37% of the working population now consider their future income to be sufficient compared with 62% in 2007.
Badrulsyah roughly estimates that he will need about RM750,000 in his retirement fund and if invested wisely, should generate an income stream of its own.
“I try to put away 50% of my income every month, and this includes EPF contributions, insurance premiums, property investments and more.
“However, it is not easy as there are other obligations such as the house and car loans, utility bills and food expenditure,” he says.
Lee Yun-Han, 25, is one who had his life mapped out from when he was still in secondary school.
“I came up with my lifetime plan 10 years ago – become a professional chartered accountant, work my way up the corporate ladder and become the CEO of a listed company.”
Lee saysthe accounting path did not work out so well, but his plan is still on course.
“I modified my plan, and today I work as a management consultant. I am now in step two of my plan, and remain hopeful that I will reach step three before I retire.”
Lee also believes it is crucial to start planning early.
“Life goes by really fast, and before you know it, retirement is just around the corner. I have now lived a quarter of a century, and the time seems to have passed in a blink of the eye. With another blink, I will be 50, and in a third blink, I could be pushing up daisies (deceased).”
Lee has done his homework on how much he will need for retirement.
“I estimate that I will require at least RM5.1mil, assuming that I live for another 35 years and need RM5,000 a month to get by.
“I make a conscious effort not only to save, but also to grow my savings by investing in a diversified portfolio of shares and property.
“Right now, 50% of my income goes to servicing my loans on investment properties, 30% to bills, and 20% to cash reserves. There is a separate slush fund for girlfriend expenditure that is not on the books,” quips Lee.
Furthermore, not everyone who is not planning for retirement is living an extravagant lifestyle.
Anusya says that she does not spend money freely.
“Money is hard to come by – that much I have realised over the past few years. I realise now that I am more careful with my own money than I was when getting hand-outs from my parents!”
She says that she does buy the occasional piece of designer wear and her husband sports the latest-generation mobile phone.
“We like to enjoy life, and if this means spending money, then we will. But we only do so after the bills have been paid and there is money to spare.”
Anusya also says that they have other financial priorities besides retirement planning.
“We are saving to buy our own house, and also need a second car. Even after we have enough for that, there is the family issue to think about.
“Quite frankly, I do not see a distinction between the act of saving money and planning for retirement. We put some money away every month for what we call our ‘emergency’ fund, so isn’t that the same?”
Similarly, Tan likes to enjoy life, and she has a passion for visiting new places.
“I have an addiction to travel, so there’s quite a heavy monthly expense there. But I try to save about RM1,000 to RM2,000 every month.”
She says that she does not have any fixed monthly commitments now, but she expects more of them in future. That could be one of the reasons she still puts money away whenever possible, and not necessarily for retirement.
“I started saving five years ago when I got my first full-time job. I would feel insecure if I had no savings. We will always need to save for that rainy day that could hit us anytime – be it being stuck in a period of unemployment, or hospitalisation fees for a close family member, or to cover for those days when we just want to quit and travel the world,” she says.
Ultimately, those interviewed wished that their retirement will come at a time they choose, and not be forced upon them.
“The retirement age is something forced upon you by virtue of policy and legislation. If you enjoy and love what you do, it becomes a passion – and you do not retire from a passion,” says Lee.
“I would want to continue working past the retirement age of 55 – not because of the money, but because I would be able to contribute so much more to society. I would very much want to keep my body active, my mind sharp, and my spirit alive.”
But for Linda Eng, 31, an administration executive with a construction company, retirement planning is not just about saving.
“Yes, I have my own contingency fund for my retirement, i.e. savings in the bank, a small investment amount in unit trust funds and, of course, EPF. I am now planning to buy a house for my retirement. So, I have to work hard to ensure that my retirement life is well planned.
“Recently, however, something happened that made me realise only having savings is not enough. I need to also protect what I have saved.”
She explains that one of her colleagues who seemed to be in perfect health, ate well and kept a balanced lifestyle was diagnosed with cancer.
“It was a terrible shock to all of us, and what was even more shocking was that he had to spend close to RM100,000 for medical treatment. He and his family had to use some of their hard-earned savings, which was meant to be used for later years. It was gone in a blink of an eye!”
While Eng accepts that uncertainties in life cannot be controlled, “It can happen to anyone at any age”, she believes one can take precautions.
“It is not about how much you saved because what you have saved may just disappear overnight when something unexpected happens. And when it does, I do not want my savings to be affected. I want to be sure that my retirement fund will last my lifetime.”
- Source from The Star, 24 October 2010 by Joseph Loh
FOR many young adults, retirement is not something they are thinking about at this stage of their lives. Those who have been working for less than 10 years have only recently begun to establish their careers, so foremost on their mind would be working to achieve success in their respective vocations.
For them, life still has a lot to offer, and the process of winding down an active lifestyle and retiring is, quite simply, not high on their list of things to do.
According to the findings of the AXA Retirement Scope 2010, a global retirement study conducted across 26 countries in Europe, the United States and Asia, the percentage of the Malaysian working population who have started preparing for their retirement has declined from 48% in 2007 to 38% in 2010. The study also shows that among the 38% who have started to prepare for retirement, most of them did so only at or near age of 40. Meanwhile, 46% said they would start to prepare for retirement when they hit 50.
Among the young, only one in five has started to prepare for retirement. Most of them do plan to start but rather late, at age 46.
Take for example, Anusya Sree, 28, who got married late last year.
“Retirement is not something I am thinking about at the moment; and isn’t it a negative thought with so much yet to do? I am only just experiencing life as a married woman. I am looking forward to spending many happy years with my husband and raising a family of our own,” says the bank executive.
For Anusya, her priority now is to ensure she has a successful career.
“I have been working for five years, and am enjoying the thrill of being an independent working adult. I have not even decided when I will have children, much less when I will retire.”
Similarly for Nicole Tan, 26, a producer for an online travel web portal, retirement is not high on her list of priorities at the moment.
“No, I have not started planning. I would like to build up my career so I have a good platform from where I can start planning for retirement. I am saving up to buy my first property, if that counts.”
However, she is aware that having sufficient funds in her retirement years will require a large amount of money.
“It would be an astronomical amount. I am not capable of reaching even 10% of it at the moment,” says Tan.
Findings of the AXA Retirement Scope 2010 survey confirm the general perception that only 14% of the Malaysian working population know exactly how much their retirement income should be.
However, not all young adults are focused on the here and now.
Badrulsyah, 35, for example, started planning for his eventual retirement five years ago.
“It is vital for one to start planning early. I learnt that if you leave it to the last minute, you will not have enough time to build up sufficient funds.
“I also know I cannot count on EPF savings alone. After making withdrawals to buy a house, for example, there is even less money to last through the retirement years,” says the self-employed entrepreneur.
The AXA Retirement Scope 2010 survey findings show that the working segment’s (especially young and mid-life) level of confidence in their own amount of retirement income suffered a big drop from 2007. Only 37% of the working population now consider their future income to be sufficient compared with 62% in 2007.
Badrulsyah roughly estimates that he will need about RM750,000 in his retirement fund and if invested wisely, should generate an income stream of its own.
“I try to put away 50% of my income every month, and this includes EPF contributions, insurance premiums, property investments and more.
“However, it is not easy as there are other obligations such as the house and car loans, utility bills and food expenditure,” he says.
Lee Yun-Han, 25, is one who had his life mapped out from when he was still in secondary school.
“I came up with my lifetime plan 10 years ago – become a professional chartered accountant, work my way up the corporate ladder and become the CEO of a listed company.”
Lee saysthe accounting path did not work out so well, but his plan is still on course.
“I modified my plan, and today I work as a management consultant. I am now in step two of my plan, and remain hopeful that I will reach step three before I retire.”
Lee also believes it is crucial to start planning early.
“Life goes by really fast, and before you know it, retirement is just around the corner. I have now lived a quarter of a century, and the time seems to have passed in a blink of the eye. With another blink, I will be 50, and in a third blink, I could be pushing up daisies (deceased).”
Lee has done his homework on how much he will need for retirement.
“I estimate that I will require at least RM5.1mil, assuming that I live for another 35 years and need RM5,000 a month to get by.
“I make a conscious effort not only to save, but also to grow my savings by investing in a diversified portfolio of shares and property.
“Right now, 50% of my income goes to servicing my loans on investment properties, 30% to bills, and 20% to cash reserves. There is a separate slush fund for girlfriend expenditure that is not on the books,” quips Lee.
Furthermore, not everyone who is not planning for retirement is living an extravagant lifestyle.
Anusya says that she does not spend money freely.
“Money is hard to come by – that much I have realised over the past few years. I realise now that I am more careful with my own money than I was when getting hand-outs from my parents!”
She says that she does buy the occasional piece of designer wear and her husband sports the latest-generation mobile phone.
“We like to enjoy life, and if this means spending money, then we will. But we only do so after the bills have been paid and there is money to spare.”
Anusya also says that they have other financial priorities besides retirement planning.
“We are saving to buy our own house, and also need a second car. Even after we have enough for that, there is the family issue to think about.
“Quite frankly, I do not see a distinction between the act of saving money and planning for retirement. We put some money away every month for what we call our ‘emergency’ fund, so isn’t that the same?”
Similarly, Tan likes to enjoy life, and she has a passion for visiting new places.
“I have an addiction to travel, so there’s quite a heavy monthly expense there. But I try to save about RM1,000 to RM2,000 every month.”
She says that she does not have any fixed monthly commitments now, but she expects more of them in future. That could be one of the reasons she still puts money away whenever possible, and not necessarily for retirement.
“I started saving five years ago when I got my first full-time job. I would feel insecure if I had no savings. We will always need to save for that rainy day that could hit us anytime – be it being stuck in a period of unemployment, or hospitalisation fees for a close family member, or to cover for those days when we just want to quit and travel the world,” she says.
Ultimately, those interviewed wished that their retirement will come at a time they choose, and not be forced upon them.
“The retirement age is something forced upon you by virtue of policy and legislation. If you enjoy and love what you do, it becomes a passion – and you do not retire from a passion,” says Lee.
“I would want to continue working past the retirement age of 55 – not because of the money, but because I would be able to contribute so much more to society. I would very much want to keep my body active, my mind sharp, and my spirit alive.”
But for Linda Eng, 31, an administration executive with a construction company, retirement planning is not just about saving.
“Yes, I have my own contingency fund for my retirement, i.e. savings in the bank, a small investment amount in unit trust funds and, of course, EPF. I am now planning to buy a house for my retirement. So, I have to work hard to ensure that my retirement life is well planned.
“Recently, however, something happened that made me realise only having savings is not enough. I need to also protect what I have saved.”
She explains that one of her colleagues who seemed to be in perfect health, ate well and kept a balanced lifestyle was diagnosed with cancer.
“It was a terrible shock to all of us, and what was even more shocking was that he had to spend close to RM100,000 for medical treatment. He and his family had to use some of their hard-earned savings, which was meant to be used for later years. It was gone in a blink of an eye!”
While Eng accepts that uncertainties in life cannot be controlled, “It can happen to anyone at any age”, she believes one can take precautions.
“It is not about how much you saved because what you have saved may just disappear overnight when something unexpected happens. And when it does, I do not want my savings to be affected. I want to be sure that my retirement fund will last my lifetime.”
- Source from The Star, 24 October 2010 by Joseph Loh
Where there's a will, there's a way
WE all know the importance of writing a will but it is one of those things
that many of us never seem to get around to. In fact, it is estimated that 95%
of people die without ever having made a will.
In Malaysia alone, less than 5% of the adult population have drawn up their wills.
If you do not have a will, it can lead to chaos and financial worry for your family or dependants after you are gone. For some, it could also cause a major family rift.
One thing for sure, without a will, you are not in control and you can’t be sure that your money and property will be passed on according to your wishes.
If you decide to write a will, there are options of either using a bank or will-writing firm, or doing it yourself by using a will pack. Since there is no fixed costs to writing a will, it is difficult to provide a cost comparison between the three but fees typically range from RM380 for a simple will to RM12,000 for a comprehensive one.
The fees charged by estate planning firm Rockwills International Group, which has signed up 10,000 wills as at November, are fixed according to a scale.
A do-it-yourself (DIY) will, of course, means there are no fees but could be risky as the will may not be drafted properly in compliance with the Wills Act, 1959.
What is the normal fee for a trustee and how much can a trustee charge to handle an estate after a death? And what are “reasonable” trustee fees?
A trustee is normally paid a small nominal appointment fee during the preparation of a will. There will not be any other charges until the testator passes on. The trustee will have to apply for a grant of probate through a lawyer and a fee will be paid to the lawyer for such services.
After the probate is obtained, the trustee will proceed with the estate administration process and the charges will depend on the assets and its value. If there are transfers of properties, then there will be the usual legal fees and stamp charges.
Normally, trustee fees range from 1% to 2% of the estate value. For an estate worth RM1mil, the fee could come up to RM10,000. Is it a fair price to pay?
Rockwills managing director Saw Leong Aun says is it a misconception that appointing a trust company will increase the administration costs and reduce the amount to be received by beneficiaries.
“Under the probate law, the fee allowed is up to 5%. Considering the difficulty and tedious nature of an executor’s role and functions, the trustee fees of 1% to 2% are very reasonable and competitive,” he tells StarBizWeek.
Singapore-based Estate Planning Practitioners Ltd (EPPL) director Bernard Lim also concurs the onerous responsibilities undertaken by a trustee justifies the 1% fee.
“You have to take into account the duty of care they have to perform to ensure that the interest of the beneficiaries are well taken care off. Also, the potential liabilities they carry are not something to be taken lightly,” he says.
“Fund or investment managers typically charge 1%-1.5% for managing the funds of their clients and often the financial planners themselves may impose 0.25% to 0.75% charge on asset under management as annual fees,” he says.
“With this in mind, I feel that a 1% charge is reasonable.”
Financial planner Chear Weng Khet says it is worthwhile to pay the fee if one has large assets “due to the complexities that could typically crop up”.
“The tendency for a will to be challenged is higher if one has a larger estate. It is better left to professionals as they know what to do,” he says, noting that time, effort and travelling costs should also be taken into account.
“Sometimes, professionals can be working on a case for one to two years. People who are in business would not mind paying the 1% fee to get it sorted for them,” he says.
Alternatively, one can get family members to be the executor. And it is always a good idea to nominate more than one executor in your will.
Financial planner Lawrence Tan says there should be a cap on the trustee fee.
“For an estate of RM1mil, the fee would usually be RM10,000 (1% of the estate value to be distributed). It is actually quite worthwhile because we are paying for a service whereby we can go on with our life. However, I personally feel there should be a cap on the fee,” he says.
“For people with assets of smaller value, especially below RM600,000, if they are not willing to pay the fee, then they can apply through Harta Pesaka Kecil. Of course, the process is shorter but you can run around yourself,” he says.
Lim of EPPL says there is a strong need for more qualified professionals in the specialised field of estate planning with the changing demographic and social trends in the country.
“Malaysia is at a stage where it is ready not to just take instructions on estate planning but have integrated solutions on it,” he says.
Lim says the Associate Estate Planning Practitioner (AEPP) designation is expected to raise the standards of the industry.
“Since its launch in Singapore in 2007, more than 600 practitioners from banks, insurance companies and independent financial advisors have completed the course. We expect 1000 people to be certified estate planners by next year,” he says.
Lim says financial planners are already providing products and services in the areas of wealth protection (insurance planning) and wealth accumulation (retirement planning) but do not provide much in wealth distribution (estate planning).
“I believe it is necessary to learn from the more developed countries on how wealth distribution can be incorporated into a financial planner’s practice to help their clients complete their wealth plan,” he says.
Here are some essential tips on will writing:
1. A will that is not properly signed and witnessed is invalid.
2. If you use a will writer, check what qualifications he has and by whom his firm is regulated. Also ask for evidence of indemnity insurance and for details about procedures should you or your beneficiaries have a problem with the will.
3. Don’t assume that if you use a solicitor or will writer, you will always get an expert – always ask for qualifications. If you need advice on inheritance tax, for instance, make sure that the person writing your will has additional tax qualifications.
4. If you use your bank to write your will, check how its will-writing service is regulated.
5. Don’t appoint a solicitor or bank as executor, as this can be expensive, but appoint a trusted friend or relative (or one of your children who is of above 18) instead. They can always pay for professional help if they need it later.
6. Should your circumstances change, for example if you get divorced or have children, don’t forget to update your will.
7. When not to DIY:
·Your circumstances are complicated or the way you wish to pass your assets on is very detailed.
·Someone who is unable to care for him or herself is financially dependent on you.
·You have been married before or have children from a previous marriage.
·You have property overseas.
·There is a business involved.
·You want to reduce or avoid inheritance tax.
- Source from The Star, 19 September 2009 by Eileen Hee
In Malaysia alone, less than 5% of the adult population have drawn up their wills.
If you do not have a will, it can lead to chaos and financial worry for your family or dependants after you are gone. For some, it could also cause a major family rift.
One thing for sure, without a will, you are not in control and you can’t be sure that your money and property will be passed on according to your wishes.
If you decide to write a will, there are options of either using a bank or will-writing firm, or doing it yourself by using a will pack. Since there is no fixed costs to writing a will, it is difficult to provide a cost comparison between the three but fees typically range from RM380 for a simple will to RM12,000 for a comprehensive one.
The fees charged by estate planning firm Rockwills International Group, which has signed up 10,000 wills as at November, are fixed according to a scale.
A do-it-yourself (DIY) will, of course, means there are no fees but could be risky as the will may not be drafted properly in compliance with the Wills Act, 1959.
What is the normal fee for a trustee and how much can a trustee charge to handle an estate after a death? And what are “reasonable” trustee fees?
A trustee is normally paid a small nominal appointment fee during the preparation of a will. There will not be any other charges until the testator passes on. The trustee will have to apply for a grant of probate through a lawyer and a fee will be paid to the lawyer for such services.
After the probate is obtained, the trustee will proceed with the estate administration process and the charges will depend on the assets and its value. If there are transfers of properties, then there will be the usual legal fees and stamp charges.
Normally, trustee fees range from 1% to 2% of the estate value. For an estate worth RM1mil, the fee could come up to RM10,000. Is it a fair price to pay?
Rockwills managing director Saw Leong Aun says is it a misconception that appointing a trust company will increase the administration costs and reduce the amount to be received by beneficiaries.
“Under the probate law, the fee allowed is up to 5%. Considering the difficulty and tedious nature of an executor’s role and functions, the trustee fees of 1% to 2% are very reasonable and competitive,” he tells StarBizWeek.
Singapore-based Estate Planning Practitioners Ltd (EPPL) director Bernard Lim also concurs the onerous responsibilities undertaken by a trustee justifies the 1% fee.
“You have to take into account the duty of care they have to perform to ensure that the interest of the beneficiaries are well taken care off. Also, the potential liabilities they carry are not something to be taken lightly,” he says.
“Fund or investment managers typically charge 1%-1.5% for managing the funds of their clients and often the financial planners themselves may impose 0.25% to 0.75% charge on asset under management as annual fees,” he says.
“With this in mind, I feel that a 1% charge is reasonable.”
Financial planner Chear Weng Khet says it is worthwhile to pay the fee if one has large assets “due to the complexities that could typically crop up”.
“The tendency for a will to be challenged is higher if one has a larger estate. It is better left to professionals as they know what to do,” he says, noting that time, effort and travelling costs should also be taken into account.
“Sometimes, professionals can be working on a case for one to two years. People who are in business would not mind paying the 1% fee to get it sorted for them,” he says.
Alternatively, one can get family members to be the executor. And it is always a good idea to nominate more than one executor in your will.
Financial planner Lawrence Tan says there should be a cap on the trustee fee.
“For an estate of RM1mil, the fee would usually be RM10,000 (1% of the estate value to be distributed). It is actually quite worthwhile because we are paying for a service whereby we can go on with our life. However, I personally feel there should be a cap on the fee,” he says.
“For people with assets of smaller value, especially below RM600,000, if they are not willing to pay the fee, then they can apply through Harta Pesaka Kecil. Of course, the process is shorter but you can run around yourself,” he says.
Lim of EPPL says there is a strong need for more qualified professionals in the specialised field of estate planning with the changing demographic and social trends in the country.
“Malaysia is at a stage where it is ready not to just take instructions on estate planning but have integrated solutions on it,” he says.
Lim says the Associate Estate Planning Practitioner (AEPP) designation is expected to raise the standards of the industry.
“Since its launch in Singapore in 2007, more than 600 practitioners from banks, insurance companies and independent financial advisors have completed the course. We expect 1000 people to be certified estate planners by next year,” he says.
Lim says financial planners are already providing products and services in the areas of wealth protection (insurance planning) and wealth accumulation (retirement planning) but do not provide much in wealth distribution (estate planning).
“I believe it is necessary to learn from the more developed countries on how wealth distribution can be incorporated into a financial planner’s practice to help their clients complete their wealth plan,” he says.
Here are some essential tips on will writing:
1. A will that is not properly signed and witnessed is invalid.
2. If you use a will writer, check what qualifications he has and by whom his firm is regulated. Also ask for evidence of indemnity insurance and for details about procedures should you or your beneficiaries have a problem with the will.
3. Don’t assume that if you use a solicitor or will writer, you will always get an expert – always ask for qualifications. If you need advice on inheritance tax, for instance, make sure that the person writing your will has additional tax qualifications.
4. If you use your bank to write your will, check how its will-writing service is regulated.
5. Don’t appoint a solicitor or bank as executor, as this can be expensive, but appoint a trusted friend or relative (or one of your children who is of above 18) instead. They can always pay for professional help if they need it later.
6. Should your circumstances change, for example if you get divorced or have children, don’t forget to update your will.
7. When not to DIY:
·Your circumstances are complicated or the way you wish to pass your assets on is very detailed.
·Someone who is unable to care for him or herself is financially dependent on you.
·You have been married before or have children from a previous marriage.
·You have property overseas.
·There is a business involved.
·You want to reduce or avoid inheritance tax.
- Source from The Star, 19 September 2009 by Eileen Hee
We All Need To Become Millionaires
One must have cash reserves of about RM1mil to be able to maintain one’s current lifestyle 20 years after retirement.
WE need to become millionaires when we retire! A lot of people have misconceptions about being millionaires. To them, being a millionaire means they should own total assets – by adding up their total cash, house, Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) contribution and car – that are worth RM1mil and above.
They believe that once they achieve one million cash, they should enjoy themselves by driving big luxury cars and staying in bungalows.
In reality, all of us need to become millionaires when we retire at age 55. Based on our computation, we need to own total cash, including all money in savings, fixed deposits and EPF, which have total value of more than RM1mil.
The key principle here is we need to have cash reserves of more than RM1mil to be able to maintain our current lifestyle 20 years after retirement from age 55 to age 75. This is on the assumption that we can live up to 75 (the average lifespan of Malaysians).
Based on our computation (see table), if you are now 35 years old and your current monthly expenses are RM3,000 per month, assuming you are only able to generate a return of 3% (the return from fixed deposits) on all of your savings and the RM3,000 will grow by the average historical inflation rate of 3.5% per annum, you would need RM1.6mil when you retire at age 55.
This amount will be enough to maintain your current lifestyle for the next 20 years after your retirement at 55.
However, if you need to spend RM5,000, RM7,000 or RM10,000 per month, then you need RM2.6mil, RM3.7mil and RM5.3mil respectively at your retirement age of 55.
In short, you need to become a millionaire when you retire even if you only maintain a simple lifestyle after your retirement. You will not be able to use this money to buy a big luxury car or a bungalow, as you really need the money for the next 20 years.
Thomas J. Stanley and William D. Danko have conducted research on the reasons why some Americans become wealthy. They discovered that a lot of them live well below their means.
Unfortunately, we notice that some Malaysians do not have enough money when they retire. Some of them may not be aware that they really need to accumulate that amount of money when they retire. Some may be aware, but they may have used up all their savings to support their children’s education. As a result, they need to find a job after retirement.
Some may have difficulties finding a job. A lot of companies may prefer to employ a young graduate rather than a retiree unless the latter is willing to accept a lower pay.
We also believe that a lot of investors are quite worried about having enough money for retirement. They are also concerned that their money may not be enough to protect them against inflation. Hence, besides controlling our expenses, we also need to know how to grow our money.
Looking at the table, different minimum achievable annual target returns can provide different required amounts for retirement.
For the current monthly expenses of RM3,000, if you are only able to generate a 3% return per annum, then you need to have RM1.6mil for retirement whereas you only need about RM900,000 if you are able to generate a return of 10%.
However, higher returns come with higher risks. We need to understand our risk tolerance level. We need to equip ourselves with adequate investing knowledge if we intend to generate higher returns.
- Source from The Star, 28 January 2009 by Ooi Kok Hwa.
WE need to become millionaires when we retire! A lot of people have misconceptions about being millionaires. To them, being a millionaire means they should own total assets – by adding up their total cash, house, Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) contribution and car – that are worth RM1mil and above.
They believe that once they achieve one million cash, they should enjoy themselves by driving big luxury cars and staying in bungalows.
In reality, all of us need to become millionaires when we retire at age 55. Based on our computation, we need to own total cash, including all money in savings, fixed deposits and EPF, which have total value of more than RM1mil.
Ooi Kok Hwa: "The key principle here is we need to have
cash reserves of more than RM1mil to be able to maintain
our current lifestyle 20 years after retirement."
The key principle here is we need to have cash reserves of more than RM1mil to be able to maintain our current lifestyle 20 years after retirement from age 55 to age 75. This is on the assumption that we can live up to 75 (the average lifespan of Malaysians).
Based on our computation (see table), if you are now 35 years old and your current monthly expenses are RM3,000 per month, assuming you are only able to generate a return of 3% (the return from fixed deposits) on all of your savings and the RM3,000 will grow by the average historical inflation rate of 3.5% per annum, you would need RM1.6mil when you retire at age 55.
This amount will be enough to maintain your current lifestyle for the next 20 years after your retirement at 55.
However, if you need to spend RM5,000, RM7,000 or RM10,000 per month, then you need RM2.6mil, RM3.7mil and RM5.3mil respectively at your retirement age of 55.
In short, you need to become a millionaire when you retire even if you only maintain a simple lifestyle after your retirement. You will not be able to use this money to buy a big luxury car or a bungalow, as you really need the money for the next 20 years.
Thomas J. Stanley and William D. Danko have conducted research on the reasons why some Americans become wealthy. They discovered that a lot of them live well below their means.
Unfortunately, we notice that some Malaysians do not have enough money when they retire. Some of them may not be aware that they really need to accumulate that amount of money when they retire. Some may be aware, but they may have used up all their savings to support their children’s education. As a result, they need to find a job after retirement.
Some may have difficulties finding a job. A lot of companies may prefer to employ a young graduate rather than a retiree unless the latter is willing to accept a lower pay.
We also believe that a lot of investors are quite worried about having enough money for retirement. They are also concerned that their money may not be enough to protect them against inflation. Hence, besides controlling our expenses, we also need to know how to grow our money.
Looking at the table, different minimum achievable annual target returns can provide different required amounts for retirement.
For the current monthly expenses of RM3,000, if you are only able to generate a 3% return per annum, then you need to have RM1.6mil for retirement whereas you only need about RM900,000 if you are able to generate a return of 10%.
However, higher returns come with higher risks. We need to understand our risk tolerance level. We need to equip ourselves with adequate investing knowledge if we intend to generate higher returns.
- Source from The Star, 28 January 2009 by Ooi Kok Hwa.
Way Too Young To Retire At 55?
With the lifespan of a Malaysian man projected to be 74.4 in 2025, will the individual be able to support himself into old age if he retires at 55? It may be a win-win situation if the age is extended as keeping those beyond 55 would boost the workforce.
IF MALAYSIA’S maximum retirement age is increased to 60, there could potentially be close to a million more workers to boost the nation’s workforce within five years.
Extending the “traditional” retirement age from 55 could very well be part of a solution to reduce the country’s reliance on foreign workers.
Talk is rife again that the retirement age may be extended. Cuepacs has been pushing for an increase in the maximum of the retirement age of civil servants to 60 for about 10 years. Having partially succeeded in achieving its goals twice – from 55 to 56 in 2001, and to 58 in 2008 – it is pushing the envelope further and recently made another proposal to the Government to raise it to 60.
According to the Malaysian Statistics Department’s Labour Force Survey Report 2008, the total number of employed persons from the age band of 50 to 54 is 872,700 while those between 55 and 59 number 476,800, or 4.5% of the total workforce of 10,659,600 in the country.
Although there is no fixed statutory limit for retirement for Malaysia, there are inferences to the age of 55 in other legislation.
“For example, the EPF act says you can withdraw your savings when you reach 55. Additionally, the Employees’ Social Security (Socso) Acts say once you reach 55, you are no longer eligible for an invalidity pension. These are the things that have led the country to adopt 55 as the retirement age,” says Malaysian Employers Federation (MEF) executive director Shamsuddin Bardan.
Cuepacs president Omar Osman believes that raising the retirement age is the way forward for the country.
“Most other countries, regionally and globally, have fixed the age at 60 or later. Malaysia is one of the few countries where the working population retires relatively early. The time is ripe to raise the age to 60 so we can be brought in line with other countries,” he says.
Shamsuddin says that 80% of the private sector sets the age at 55.
“It was set in the context of the 1950s, where the life expectancy at that time was lower than 55. So people did not even live to retirement age then,” he says.
However, recent statistics show that life expectancy among Malaysians has increased dramatically. For men, it was 47 in 1950, rising to 66 in 1980, 70.8 in 2000 and is projected to be 74.4 in 2025 (women tend to live about five years longer).
The issue that arises from a longer life span is the ability of the individual to support himself into old age.
“If we stick to 55, then we have a gap of about 20 years for the individual to live. How will they support themselves for that period?” he says.
Shamsuddin says the majority of people in the private sector tend to rely solely on their EPF savings, and most the time it is insufficient.
According to EPF statistics, members have an average savings of RM132,539.78 at age 55. Given that an individual can live for about 20 years after retiring, this only leaves him with a mere RM552 per month to live on.
“This is below the national poverty line of RM750,” says Shamsuddin, qualifying that the figure is for the total household income.
However, he informs that if a person was to work for an additional five years, his savings would go up by about RM40,000.
“With the additional savings, he would have just over RM700 per month, which is still below the poverty line, but it is better,” he says.
Dr Jariah Masud, senior research fellow, Gerontology Institute, Universiti Putra Malaysia, brings up the point that Malaysians are starting families later in life than before.
“They may still have school-going children at retirement, and there is no comprehensive social protection system or a universal pension scheme. Furthermore, Malaysians, generally speaking, do not do much financial planning for retirement,” she says.
One point that constantly arises is the loss of human capital if people retire at 55.
Dr Jariah opines that with a population of about 28 million, Malaysia’s human resources are limited, and their continued service will be useful for national development.
Omar adds that training a new set of workers to take over from retired posts will incur a high cost, and it would be prudent to keep the experienced in service for longer periods.
“Anyway, it is a waste to train a person up to a high level and then let them go early,” he says.
Dr Jariah says that logically, those at the tail end of their careers have vast experience behind them, and are naturally better at their jobs than those with fewer years of experience.
In a study conducted by the university, 96.3% of respondents acknowledged that older people have amassed considerable expertise and skills.
“Take educationists, for example. Professors and lecturers with 30 years of teaching behind them are better than those with just five. Provided, that is, that they stay in the same organisation,” she says.
Omar shares the opinions and gives the example of judges where experience is crucial.
“Everybody can work, but how the younger people solve a problem compared to the older generation is different,” he says.
Dr Jariah believes that if they were to continue working, they need not necessarily be employed in the same position, and even their roles in the organisation could be changed.
“They can be turned into mentors and trainers, and be a model for the younger generation. That would be better than waiting for them to retire and then looking for new workers. It is also their obligation to transfer knowledge to younger workers so there is continuity,” she says.
However, Shamsuddin is not in favour of a blanket increase in the retirement age.
“Companies will be saddled with a higher cost of medical treatment for employees. Older workers usually draw a higher salary, so wage costs are also going to increase. There is also the possibility that their performance and productivity will go down,” he says, adding that the current system of a contractual re-employment, as practised currently, works well.
However, Omar says Cuepacs wants to do away with the contract system in Government service.
“People do not like having yearly contract extensions, and the extra paperwork is also a burden to the Government. We want people at every level to be in full service, and not on contract. It also brings unnecessary worry to the worker.
“Furthermore, there can be some resentment in the staff if the leaders are getting both a pension and a contract salary,” he says.
There is also the worry that retaining older workers will saturate the job market and deprive fresh graduates of employment, and career advancement opportunities for those already in employment.
Omar does not see any basis for that argument.
“Since the age limit was raised two years ago, this has not been an issue. Furthermore, in government service there are many avenues for career advancement,” he says.
Dr Jariah says that the younger generation should be innovative enough to find and create jobs for themselves rather than aim for the one or two top posts.
“Extending the retirement age does not mean depriving the younger generation. There are many opportunities out there, and it is better to look for those rather than wait for people to retire,” she says.
Shamsuddin sees things in a different light and believes that while there are opportunities, it may not be the right one for the individual.
“Currently, for graduates coming out of university, getting the employment suitable for their qualifications is a challenge. There is a lot of latent employment – they may be employed but not to the full capacity of what they should be,” he says.
Another worry is if the employee in question is not productive, and an organisation is saddled with his wage bill without returns on the investment.
Dr Jariah believes that salary should be commensurate with ability and productivity
“It can be measured with a KPI, and the mindset has to be changed. At the moment we always equate position with salary,” she says.
While Shamsuddin has some reservations on extending the retirement age, he agrees with the concept.
He says that in order to facilitate this, wholesale changes are needed in the employment structure.
“It needs a lot of thorough planning, and the Government needs to put things in place. They can offer incentives for companies to re-employ them, so there is less resentment among employers,” he says.
Giving the example of medical costs, Shamsuddin says that companies could be allowed to obtain double tax relief for medical costs.
“Given that retirees will probably go to public hospitals, the burden is on the Government. With this incentive, companies are bearing the costs instead,” he says.
Incentives should be given to employees as well.
“The Government should consider a maximum tax bracket of 15% instead of 27%. If they can give this incentive to workers in Iskandar Malaysia, why not to the others?” asks Shamsuddin.
Dr Jariah says the current employment structure is not ready for an elderly population.
“We have a system that is very rigid and bureaucratic. Some may not want to work full time three days a week; but now they have to work full-time or a five-day week,” she says.
Omar says that Cuepac’s proposal has been submitted and the nation awaits the Government’s decision on the matter.
“There are many benefits to having a later retirement age. We have been discussing it for a long time, and our request is under consideration. When the time is ripe, they will announce it. It is up to the Prime Minister,” he says.
- Source from The Star, 2 May 2010 by Joseph Loh.
IF MALAYSIA’S maximum retirement age is increased to 60, there could potentially be close to a million more workers to boost the nation’s workforce within five years.
Extending the “traditional” retirement age from 55 could very well be part of a solution to reduce the country’s reliance on foreign workers.
Talk is rife again that the retirement age may be extended. Cuepacs has been pushing for an increase in the maximum of the retirement age of civil servants to 60 for about 10 years. Having partially succeeded in achieving its goals twice – from 55 to 56 in 2001, and to 58 in 2008 – it is pushing the envelope further and recently made another proposal to the Government to raise it to 60.
Loss of resources: As many retirees are still in their prime at 55, their
services will be much needed for national development. – AFP
According to the Malaysian Statistics Department’s Labour Force Survey Report 2008, the total number of employed persons from the age band of 50 to 54 is 872,700 while those between 55 and 59 number 476,800, or 4.5% of the total workforce of 10,659,600 in the country.
Although there is no fixed statutory limit for retirement for Malaysia, there are inferences to the age of 55 in other legislation.
“For example, the EPF act says you can withdraw your savings when you reach 55. Additionally, the Employees’ Social Security (Socso) Acts say once you reach 55, you are no longer eligible for an invalidity pension. These are the things that have led the country to adopt 55 as the retirement age,” says Malaysian Employers Federation (MEF) executive director Shamsuddin Bardan.
Cuepacs president Omar Osman believes that raising the retirement age is the way forward for the country.
“Most other countries, regionally and globally, have fixed the age at 60 or later. Malaysia is one of the few countries where the working population retires relatively early. The time is ripe to raise the age to 60 so we can be brought in line with other countries,” he says.
Shamsuddin says that 80% of the private sector sets the age at 55.
“It was set in the context of the 1950s, where the life expectancy at that time was lower than 55. So people did not even live to retirement age then,” he says.
However, recent statistics show that life expectancy among Malaysians has increased dramatically. For men, it was 47 in 1950, rising to 66 in 1980, 70.8 in 2000 and is projected to be 74.4 in 2025 (women tend to live about five years longer).
The issue that arises from a longer life span is the ability of the individual to support himself into old age.
“If we stick to 55, then we have a gap of about 20 years for the individual to live. How will they support themselves for that period?” he says.
Shamsuddin says the majority of people in the private sector tend to rely solely on their EPF savings, and most the time it is insufficient.
According to EPF statistics, members have an average savings of RM132,539.78 at age 55. Given that an individual can live for about 20 years after retiring, this only leaves him with a mere RM552 per month to live on.
“This is below the national poverty line of RM750,” says Shamsuddin, qualifying that the figure is for the total household income.
However, he informs that if a person was to work for an additional five years, his savings would go up by about RM40,000.
“With the additional savings, he would have just over RM700 per month, which is still below the poverty line, but it is better,” he says.
Dr Jariah Masud, senior research fellow, Gerontology Institute, Universiti Putra Malaysia, brings up the point that Malaysians are starting families later in life than before.
“They may still have school-going children at retirement, and there is no comprehensive social protection system or a universal pension scheme. Furthermore, Malaysians, generally speaking, do not do much financial planning for retirement,” she says.
One point that constantly arises is the loss of human capital if people retire at 55.
Dr Jariah opines that with a population of about 28 million, Malaysia’s human resources are limited, and their continued service will be useful for national development.
Omar adds that training a new set of workers to take over from retired posts will incur a high cost, and it would be prudent to keep the experienced in service for longer periods.
“Anyway, it is a waste to train a person up to a high level and then let them go early,” he says.
Dr Jariah says that logically, those at the tail end of their careers have vast experience behind them, and are naturally better at their jobs than those with fewer years of experience.
In a study conducted by the university, 96.3% of respondents acknowledged that older people have amassed considerable expertise and skills.
“Take educationists, for example. Professors and lecturers with 30 years of teaching behind them are better than those with just five. Provided, that is, that they stay in the same organisation,” she says.
Omar shares the opinions and gives the example of judges where experience is crucial.
“Everybody can work, but how the younger people solve a problem compared to the older generation is different,” he says.
Dr Jariah believes that if they were to continue working, they need not necessarily be employed in the same position, and even their roles in the organisation could be changed.
“They can be turned into mentors and trainers, and be a model for the younger generation. That would be better than waiting for them to retire and then looking for new workers. It is also their obligation to transfer knowledge to younger workers so there is continuity,” she says.
However, Shamsuddin is not in favour of a blanket increase in the retirement age.
“Companies will be saddled with a higher cost of medical treatment for employees. Older workers usually draw a higher salary, so wage costs are also going to increase. There is also the possibility that their performance and productivity will go down,” he says, adding that the current system of a contractual re-employment, as practised currently, works well.
However, Omar says Cuepacs wants to do away with the contract system in Government service.
“People do not like having yearly contract extensions, and the extra paperwork is also a burden to the Government. We want people at every level to be in full service, and not on contract. It also brings unnecessary worry to the worker.
“Furthermore, there can be some resentment in the staff if the leaders are getting both a pension and a contract salary,” he says.
There is also the worry that retaining older workers will saturate the job market and deprive fresh graduates of employment, and career advancement opportunities for those already in employment.
Omar does not see any basis for that argument.
“Since the age limit was raised two years ago, this has not been an issue. Furthermore, in government service there are many avenues for career advancement,” he says.
Dr Jariah says that the younger generation should be innovative enough to find and create jobs for themselves rather than aim for the one or two top posts.
“Extending the retirement age does not mean depriving the younger generation. There are many opportunities out there, and it is better to look for those rather than wait for people to retire,” she says.
Shamsuddin sees things in a different light and believes that while there are opportunities, it may not be the right one for the individual.
“Currently, for graduates coming out of university, getting the employment suitable for their qualifications is a challenge. There is a lot of latent employment – they may be employed but not to the full capacity of what they should be,” he says.
Another worry is if the employee in question is not productive, and an organisation is saddled with his wage bill without returns on the investment.
Dr Jariah believes that salary should be commensurate with ability and productivity
“It can be measured with a KPI, and the mindset has to be changed. At the moment we always equate position with salary,” she says.
While Shamsuddin has some reservations on extending the retirement age, he agrees with the concept.
He says that in order to facilitate this, wholesale changes are needed in the employment structure.
“It needs a lot of thorough planning, and the Government needs to put things in place. They can offer incentives for companies to re-employ them, so there is less resentment among employers,” he says.
Giving the example of medical costs, Shamsuddin says that companies could be allowed to obtain double tax relief for medical costs.
“Given that retirees will probably go to public hospitals, the burden is on the Government. With this incentive, companies are bearing the costs instead,” he says.
Incentives should be given to employees as well.
“The Government should consider a maximum tax bracket of 15% instead of 27%. If they can give this incentive to workers in Iskandar Malaysia, why not to the others?” asks Shamsuddin.
Dr Jariah says the current employment structure is not ready for an elderly population.
“We have a system that is very rigid and bureaucratic. Some may not want to work full time three days a week; but now they have to work full-time or a five-day week,” she says.
Omar says that Cuepac’s proposal has been submitted and the nation awaits the Government’s decision on the matter.
“There are many benefits to having a later retirement age. We have been discussing it for a long time, and our request is under consideration. When the time is ripe, they will announce it. It is up to the Prime Minister,” he says.
- Source from The Star, 2 May 2010 by Joseph Loh.
Retiree works to keep active
PETALING JAYA: Despite retiring from the private sector, Affandi Samson, 61, still works, sometimes up to 16 hours a day at a petrol station here.
Besides having to support his two children who are still studying, he said he chose to work because it kept him active and healthy.
“We should be given a chance to work as long as we are mentally and physically fit and able to contribute to the organisation,” he said in welcoming the proposal to increase the retirement age for employees in the private sector.
He added that it would also help reduce their financial burden, especially since they did not have a monthly pension to rely on like civil servants.
It was reported yesterday that the retirement age for employees in the private sector looked set to be extended as both the Government and the Malaysian Employers Federation were in favour of it.
The Government agreed with unions that the retirement age, now set at 55, had to be increased as people lived longer and needed money to support themselves for the next 20 or 30 years. However, the exact age for retirement has yet to be decided.
According to last year's Employees' Provident Fund (EPF) report, active members at the age of 54 had an average of about RM146,000 in savings.
A 2003 survey commissioned by the EPF found that 70% of retirees used up all their EPF money within 10 years after they stopped working.
Vasantha Thannimalai, 56, who is providing home tuition after retiring as a kindergarten teacher last year, welcomed the move.
“Many working parents who retire at 55 still have financial commitments, such as providing for their children's education,” she said.
Retired nurse Faridah Bakri, 60, decided to get back into the workforce four months after her retirement.
“My children are now all grown up and there is not much for me to do at home,” she said, adding that she also needed to support her son's education at the time.
“I decided it would be better to work instead of using up my savings.”
Faridah served as a nurse for 31 years before retiring at 55.
- Source from The Star, 29 September 2011 by P. Aruna.
Besides having to support his two children who are still studying, he said he chose to work because it kept him active and healthy.
“We should be given a chance to work as long as we are mentally and physically fit and able to contribute to the organisation,” he said in welcoming the proposal to increase the retirement age for employees in the private sector.
He added that it would also help reduce their financial burden, especially since they did not have a monthly pension to rely on like civil servants.
Still hard at work: Affandi works at a petrol station to support his two children who are still studying.
It was reported yesterday that the retirement age for employees in the private sector looked set to be extended as both the Government and the Malaysian Employers Federation were in favour of it.
The Government agreed with unions that the retirement age, now set at 55, had to be increased as people lived longer and needed money to support themselves for the next 20 or 30 years. However, the exact age for retirement has yet to be decided.
According to last year's Employees' Provident Fund (EPF) report, active members at the age of 54 had an average of about RM146,000 in savings.
A 2003 survey commissioned by the EPF found that 70% of retirees used up all their EPF money within 10 years after they stopped working.
Vasantha Thannimalai, 56, who is providing home tuition after retiring as a kindergarten teacher last year, welcomed the move.
“Many working parents who retire at 55 still have financial commitments, such as providing for their children's education,” she said.
Retired nurse Faridah Bakri, 60, decided to get back into the workforce four months after her retirement.
“My children are now all grown up and there is not much for me to do at home,” she said, adding that she also needed to support her son's education at the time.
“I decided it would be better to work instead of using up my savings.”
Faridah served as a nurse for 31 years before retiring at 55.
- Source from The Star, 29 September 2011 by P. Aruna.
Phased EPF Withdrawals A Better Option
“IF WE were to start EPF all over again, I think we should go for regular monthly payments like the pension scheme or phased withdrawals rather than having retirees take out their money in one lump sum,” says Rusma Ibrahim, the EPF deputy chief executive officer (organisational development and strategic planning).
Rusma: "The retirement age should be around 58 or 60."
Right now, 99.9% of the contributors withdraw their EPF savings in a lump sum once they reach 55.
And it is up to the contributors to manage that money. But sadly, EPF has found that contributors tend to go through that money rather quickly.
Their first survey shows that 70% of retirees use up all their EPF money within three years after retiring. A second survey done in 2004 shows them doing better – they managed to stretch their money up to 10 years.
But that might not be good enough given the fact that people tend to live a lot longer these days. In Malaysia, life expectancy for women is 76 years and for men 72 years, which means that after retirement they have to support another 20 years of living.
And on average, contributors have RM106,000 in their EPF account when they retire; and for a number of people the EPF is their only form of savings.
“If one reaches 55, the probability is he could live until 80 even up to 83. But you can't stretch that RM100,000 for 30 years. It’s not possible,” says Rusma.
While the private sector is deemed to offer better salaries and perks and a lump sum in the EPF, ironically it is the civil servants who tend to have it better after retirement.
Their monthly pension, which is half their last drawn pay, assures them at least of a continuous source of income regardless of how long they live.
“A good pension scheme is one where there must be regular payment. The quantum will differ but at least you are guaranteed of something,” says Rusma.
An annuity-like scheme for EPF where retirees get monthly payments, she adds, would have “insured” people against the longevity risk “but we didn't start off that way.”
But the EPF, she points out, is only one source of savings. Ideally, there should be a multi-pillar system where one can rely on other sources for retirement income.
“This is something there has been discussions on. The Government can provide the policy but the market has to respond by coming up with private pension or annuity schemes for those who can afford it,” she adds.
Another way is to continue working for as long as possible. Rusma believes 55 is much too early to retire given the fact that people are still active and productive at that age.
“Going by the life expectancy, the retirement age should be around 58 or 60. It would make a lot of difference accumulating savings for another five years.
“Even in developed countries, people are talking about how to make people remain in employment for as long as possible,” she adds.
In Malaysia, because of the extended family support system, parents tend to think that “worse comes to worse” their children will take care of them and tend not to look at retirement as a problem.
“But like it or not, this support system is breaking down because of lifestyle changes. People are getting married later and having fewer kids. The children may be working in the city and parents are back in kampung and this physical distance contributes to the problem,” she says.
Rusma points out that planning when to get married and when to have children too are part and parcel of financial planning as these impact on one’s retirement.
“Ideally, when you retire, you should have settled your liabilities. If you had planned properly, your house and car should have been paid up and your children should have finished their education and should have started working, otherwise they would be a burden on you.”
And with inflation and medical costs going up, Rusma cautions, holidays after retirement have to be sacrificed.
“That’s only for the well to do. That’s the reality. Of course all of us have dreams. I have that dream too to go off to South Africa after retirement. But can I afford it? That's the reality.”
So her advice is for people to continue working as long as they can be productive, to stay healthy and to start saving from young to take care of the future.
- Source from The Star, 27 May 2007 by Shahanaaz Habib.
Phased EPF Withdrawals A Better Option
“IF WE were to start EPF all over again, I think we should go for regular monthly payments like the pension scheme or phased withdrawals rather than having retirees take out their money in one lump sum,” says Rusma Ibrahim, the EPF deputy chief executive officer (organisational development and strategic planning).
Rusma: "The retirement age should be around 58 or 60."
Right now, 99.9% of the contributors withdraw their EPF savings in a lump sum once they reach 55.
And it is up to the contributors to manage that money. But sadly, EPF has found that contributors tend to go through that money rather quickly.
Their first survey shows that 70% of retirees use up all their EPF money within three years after retiring. A second survey done in 2004 shows them doing better – they managed to stretch their money up to 10 years.
But that might not be good enough given the fact that people tend to live a lot longer these days. In Malaysia, life expectancy for women is 76 years and for men 72 years, which means that after retirement they have to support another 20 years of living.
And on average, contributors have RM106,000 in their EPF account when they retire; and for a number of people the EPF is their only form of savings.
“If one reaches 55, the probability is he could live until 80 even up to 83. But you can't stretch that RM100,000 for 30 years. It’s not possible,” says Rusma.
While the private sector is deemed to offer better salaries and perks and a lump sum in the EPF, ironically it is the civil servants who tend to have it better after retirement.
Their monthly pension, which is half their last drawn pay, assures them at least of a continuous source of income regardless of how long they live.
“A good pension scheme is one where there must be regular payment. The quantum will differ but at least you are guaranteed of something,” says Rusma.
An annuity-like scheme for EPF where retirees get monthly payments, she adds, would have “insured” people against the longevity risk “but we didn't start off that way.”
But the EPF, she points out, is only one source of savings. Ideally, there should be a multi-pillar system where one can rely on other sources for retirement income.
“This is something there has been discussions on. The Government can provide the policy but the market has to respond by coming up with private pension or annuity schemes for those who can afford it,” she adds.
Another way is to continue working for as long as possible. Rusma believes 55 is much too early to retire given the fact that people are still active and productive at that age.
“Going by the life expectancy, the retirement age should be around 58 or 60. It would make a lot of difference accumulating savings for another five years.
“Even in developed countries, people are talking about how to make people remain in employment for as long as possible,” she adds.
In Malaysia, because of the extended family support system, parents tend to think that “worse comes to worse” their children will take care of them and tend not to look at retirement as a problem.
“But like it or not, this support system is breaking down because of lifestyle changes. People are getting married later and having fewer kids. The children may be working in the city and parents are back in kampung and this physical distance contributes to the problem,” she says.
Rusma points out that planning when to get married and when to have children too are part and parcel of financial planning as these impact on one’s retirement.
“Ideally, when you retire, you should have settled your liabilities. If you had planned properly, your house and car should have been paid up and your children should have finished their education and should have started working, otherwise they would be a burden on you.”
And with inflation and medical costs going up, Rusma cautions, holidays after retirement have to be sacrificed.
“That’s only for the well to do. That’s the reality. Of course all of us have dreams. I have that dream too to go off to South Africa after retirement. But can I afford it? That's the reality.”
So her advice is for people to continue working as long as they can be productive, to stay healthy and to start saving from young to take care of the future.
- Source from The Star, 27 May 2007 by Shahanaaz Habib.
Most Malaysians Do Not Have Financial Security
ONLY 5% of Malaysians are prepared for retirement. Despite a growing awareness for the need to prepare for one’s retirement, many do not translate their plans into action.
Those in their 20s think they are too young to think about retirement, while those in their 30s and 40s tend to believe they are doing enough because they have their EPF savings. By the time they are 55, it is just too late.
The sad truth is that at 55, most people cannot retire with financial security.
Based on EPF’s 2005 annual report, about 90% of EPF contributors have less than RM100,000 in their accounts – not enough to see them through 20 years past retirement.
- Source from The Star, 27 May 2007
Those in their 20s think they are too young to think about retirement, while those in their 30s and 40s tend to believe they are doing enough because they have their EPF savings. By the time they are 55, it is just too late.
The sad truth is that at 55, most people cannot retire with financial security.
Based on EPF’s 2005 annual report, about 90% of EPF contributors have less than RM100,000 in their accounts – not enough to see them through 20 years past retirement.
- Source from The Star, 27 May 2007
Majority Neglect Retirement Plans
More than half of Malaysian workers have not prepared for retirement while those who have, only started planning after age 40, according to a survey.
The average age working Malaysians began preparing for retirement was 41, while retirees said they did so at 47.
“That’s way too late. It doesn’t give them enough time to build their retirement fund,” Axa Affin Life Insurance Bhd branding and communications head Cheah Leng Sooi said in announcing the findings of the AXA Retirement Scope 2008.
In the survey carried out by research house Synovate, 313 working people aged 25 and above and 319 retirees aged below 75 in urban areas were interviewed over the telephone.
The survey, part of a global study conducted in 26 countries and involving 18,000 respondents, was undertaken for the first time in Malaysia, from July 23 to Aug 27 last year.
Among those who had planned for retirement, most began after they married, had children, or fell into financial difficulties or had health problems, Cheah said.
Their sources of retirement income included life insurance, Employees Provident Fund and personal savings.
The retired saved an average of RM478 a month, and the working RM704, figures that were considered low compared with other countries.
“Malaysian retirees feel that their retirement income is insufficient to cover household expenses. Their average income is RM1,243 but the amount they need is RM1,568 – a deficit of RM325,” she said.
In comparison, Singapore’s average retirement income is RM3,690, and the amount needed RM3,465; while Thailand’s average income is RM1,276, and the amount needed RM903, according to the survey.
The disparity between high and low income earners in Malaysia is wide, the high-income retirees having four times more than those with low income, the survey found.
Despite insufficient income, three-quarters of the retirees said their quality of life had improved if not remaining the same, while 83% of the working group expect their quality of life to improve or remain the same.
- Source from The Star, 14 March 2008
The average age working Malaysians began preparing for retirement was 41, while retirees said they did so at 47.
“That’s way too late. It doesn’t give them enough time to build their retirement fund,” Axa Affin Life Insurance Bhd branding and communications head Cheah Leng Sooi said in announcing the findings of the AXA Retirement Scope 2008.
In the survey carried out by research house Synovate, 313 working people aged 25 and above and 319 retirees aged below 75 in urban areas were interviewed over the telephone.
The survey, part of a global study conducted in 26 countries and involving 18,000 respondents, was undertaken for the first time in Malaysia, from July 23 to Aug 27 last year.
Among those who had planned for retirement, most began after they married, had children, or fell into financial difficulties or had health problems, Cheah said.
Their sources of retirement income included life insurance, Employees Provident Fund and personal savings.
The retired saved an average of RM478 a month, and the working RM704, figures that were considered low compared with other countries.
“Malaysian retirees feel that their retirement income is insufficient to cover household expenses. Their average income is RM1,243 but the amount they need is RM1,568 – a deficit of RM325,” she said.
In comparison, Singapore’s average retirement income is RM3,690, and the amount needed RM3,465; while Thailand’s average income is RM1,276, and the amount needed RM903, according to the survey.
The disparity between high and low income earners in Malaysia is wide, the high-income retirees having four times more than those with low income, the survey found.
Despite insufficient income, three-quarters of the retirees said their quality of life had improved if not remaining the same, while 83% of the working group expect their quality of life to improve or remain the same.
- Source from The Star, 14 March 2008
How Much Do You Need For Retirement?
Retirement saving is about devising a plan
that meets your financial needs.
THERE are many retirement calculators online that can help you estimate your retirement “number”, which is how much money you need to support yourself after you retire.
With this calculator, you will be asked to enter information for the following questions:
·Your expected retirement age, and how many estimated years of retirement spending?
·Your chosen lifestyle and expected monthly expenses (basic, modest, comfortable or indulgent)?
·Details of your expected monthly expenses upon retirement (food, transport, clothing, medical, travel and entertainment, housing, and other expenses). Consider how each of these will be different at retirement age, eg your risk factors for diseases, or whether you will travel more?
·Your existing resources for retirement, including EPF, unit trust, property, fixed deposit, and other assets?
Based on projections, such as returns and inflation rates, you will get a rough estimate of how much you will need when you retire, and whether your existing resources match this number.
Remember, this is only an estimate, as there are many financial factors beyond your control. This number may change if your lifestyle or circumstances alter, for instance if you have more dependants, or experience a drastic change in income.
- Source from The Star, 12 December 2010
Counting on the Nest Egg
With people living longer, marrying and having children later and not saving enough, facing retirement is a challenge. While there is growing awareness about the need to plan, less than 5% are prepared for retirement and fail to take into consideration inflation rates and rising medical costs.
IN 1981, when Azman graduated, he got a job in KL which paid him RM1,800 a month. He bought an imported Mazda at RM17,000 and months later he put down money on a RM78,000 single-storey terrace house.
Today, 25 years later, Azman's daughter has just finished university. Her starting pay is RM1,800, just like her father's two and a half decades ago.
But unlike her father's time, imported cars cost over RM100,000 today. So Latifah has opted to buy a Proton for RM45,000 (more than double what her dad paid for his first car).
While her father could afford to buy a house early in his career, Latifah can't. Houses in KL these days cost at least RM200,000, so she has to work for a few years first before she can own one.
Compared to 25 years ago, the prices of goods, food, petrol and electricity have all gone up.
Understandably, it's an uphill task for Latifah to save on her RM1,800 salary, since the purchasing power of her salary is much lower than her father's back in the 1980s.
It is a fact that wages have not moved in tandem with the rise of the cost of living and inflation. That trend is expected to continue.
And if people do not start planning early for their retirement, they are going to find themselves in a spot after they turn 55.
Today, three meals cost you RM20 but in 20 years time – with an inflation rate of 6% a year – you will need RM64 per day for the three meals, estimates financial consultant Hazel Ong Archibald of CIMB Wealth Advisors (see Chart 1). The government puts inflation rate at 3.2% to 4.8% but Ong says in urban areas, that figure is about 6%.
So while the RM500,000 in your EPF or bank account at retirement might look good on paper, she says, if you do not invest that money to make it grow at a rate higher than the inflation rate, 20 years later, it would be worth only RM145,053 in purchasing power!
While there is more awareness about retirement planning these days, particularly in the urban areas, in reality this does not often translate into preparedness.
Why?
“Because it is more pleasurable to spend than to save,” opines Ong.
People understand – at head level – the need to plan and save, she says, but at heart level, emotions rule and instant gratification wins the battle.
“I wanted to persuade a friend to save for the future but she kept saying she had no money but then later I saw she could sign up RM3,000 and RM5,000 for some slimming packages!”
Reality hits when people find that they cannot afford to retire because they had not seriously put aside the money early on in life.
“Less than 5% are prepared for retirement,” estimates Life Insurance Association of Malaysia (LIAM) president Ng Lian Lau.
He says those in their 20s think they are too young to think about retirement, while those in their 30s and 40s tend to believe they are doing enough because they have their EPF savings, and those who are 55 feel it is just too late for them.
And the truth is at 55, most people cannot afford to retire.
“People are living longer, life expectancy for women is 76 years. For men it's 72. With this kind of longevity, people have got more than 20 years after retirement. 60 would be a more ideal retirement age,” he says.
People are marrying later too, points out Ong.
Which means they are having children later in life. If a person has a kid at the age of 35 and retires at 55, the odds are that his child at 20 would probably still be at university or college and his education require financing.
On average, the Malaysian household spent 5.7% on education last year. With the cost of education rising by 6% each year, this is expected to climb steadily.
While parents might buy an education insurance plan for their children, Ong has found that 90% of the time the amount is insufficient. More often than not, parents are willing to give up “everything”, including their own retirement fund for the kids. Which leaves them in a vulnerable position in their old age, unless of course their children provide for them.
As for life insurance, only 40% of Malaysians are covered. Ng says this is a small number compared to 100% in Singapore, 80% in the United States and 400% in Japan (where one person has four policies on average).
And even if one has a life policy as well as savings from the EPF, people should still worry about retirement. This is because without a new source of income, that money would run out. This is especially so if one runs into health problems which is common when people grow older.
“Medical inflation is easily 15% each year. And this could really eat into the savings,” warns Prudential Assurance Malaysia Bhd CEO Tan Kar Hor.
Tan likens the medical bill as a “hole” which if not plugged would leak away one's entire retirement and savings.
“It's only a question of how the big the hole is,” he says.
So parliamentary secretary to the Finance Ministry Datuk Seri Dr Hilmi Yahaya's announcement on Thursday that amendments to the Employees Provident Fund Act would allow contributors to withdraw money to buy insurance for critical illness for themselves and their family is welcome news. The amendment Bill was passed in Dewan Negara that same day.
So how much would one need for retirement?
Experts say this depends on the individual and his lifestyle. And how much he is willing to reduce consumption – to eat out less often, buy fewer things, live in a smaller house, drive less, drive a smaller car and travel less.
The rule of the thumb, says Ng, is managing on 60% of your last drawn pay.
For Ong, it's 70% of one's current lifestyle. If a family in Kuala Lumpur with two kids and two cars needs RM5,000 today, at retirement, expenses should go down to RM3,500.
Even based on this calculation, one would need RM747,000 if one were to live for 25 years after retirement, and RM806,200 for the next 30 years, factoring in the inflation and interest rates.
Going by statistics revealed in EPF's 2005 annual report, about 90% of EPF contributors have less than RM100,000 in their accounts. So sole dependence on one's EPF savings as a safety net is not good enough.
Assuming that one can live on RM1,000 a month, to survive for 25 years, one would still need a substantial RM300,000 and for 35 years, RM420,000.
Bank Negara's Counselling and Debt Management Agency (AKPK) CEO Mohamed Akwal Sultan reckons a person should not start purchasing big assets like property or a house late in life as the danger is that once they have retired they may not be able to meet the instalment payment on it.
“When you are in your late 40s, you should be winding down and not committing to high expenses to buy big things,” he says.
AKPK has dealt with a number of cases where retirees have had banks auction off their houses because they could not meet the monthly loan payment.
There is also the problem of credit card temptation. Ng notes a worrying trend that more and more younger people are becoming bankrupt as they are spending “tomorrow's money”. Which basically means these people are not saving or building their retirement nest.
Ideally, Ong says, people should start saving from the time of conception; that way would be able to enjoy the magic of the compounding effect (see Chart 2).
Prudential's Tan says a noticeable trend is that while the younger generation is prepared to invest in new financial instruments, the older generation gravitates towards fixed deposits.
“That is very risky because you would not be able to accumulate enough because the interest rates can't meet the inflationary rate and your money is getting smaller,” he says.
He believes given the current life span, it would do retirees good to be more aggressive in their investment.
“In investing, you should not be looking at the date of retirement but rather the date of potential death which is probably still another 21 years away after retirement,” he says.
He recommends that people only keep about six months of their monthly expenses in the savings and FDs and put the rest in investment products that generate more income than the inflation rate.
Ng believes a good private pension would help people in their retirement years. In developed countries, money put into savings for retirement is not taxable, neither is the profit from that investment.
“When you retire, you can't take the money out in a lump sum either or you'd have to pay tax on it. This will force you to withdraw your money on a regular monthly basis for retirement because that's tax free,” he adds.
Singapore has such a scheme, the voluntary Supplementary Retirement Scheme, which complements the Central Provident Fund (CPF). Such a scheme has not taken off in Malaysia for a number of reasons, says Ng.
It would be a loss of revenue to the Government because people would not be paying taxes on money put aside for retirement. It would benefit only the rich and middle income group as the poor might not be able to afford it, he adds.
“Perhaps it hasn't taken off too because the Malaysian economy is pretty dependent on consumer spending. And the Government wants you to spend,” he adds.
Ng says there should also be an asset liquidation law in the country. It is puzzling that there are all sorts of incentives for asset accumulation, he says, but none for liquidation.
An example of asset liquidation would be to reverse mortgage your house to the bank in return for a guaranteed monthly income until you die.
The asset would at the end of the day belong to the bank or insurance company. But in the meantime, the person has the right to continue to live in the house until death and get a monthly income too.
“If they outlive the value of the house, the bank loses,” he says.
As our population ages and life expectancy increases, more thought must be given by both individuals and the Government on how to develop a culture of planning and saving for one's retirement.
- Source from The Star, 27 May 2007 by Shahanaaz Habib.
IN 1981, when Azman graduated, he got a job in KL which paid him RM1,800 a month. He bought an imported Mazda at RM17,000 and months later he put down money on a RM78,000 single-storey terrace house.
Today, 25 years later, Azman's daughter has just finished university. Her starting pay is RM1,800, just like her father's two and a half decades ago.
Long road ahead: With the life expectancy of men at 72 and women at 76,
most people have a good 20 years to live after retirement.
But unlike her father's time, imported cars cost over RM100,000 today. So Latifah has opted to buy a Proton for RM45,000 (more than double what her dad paid for his first car).
While her father could afford to buy a house early in his career, Latifah can't. Houses in KL these days cost at least RM200,000, so she has to work for a few years first before she can own one.
Compared to 25 years ago, the prices of goods, food, petrol and electricity have all gone up.
Understandably, it's an uphill task for Latifah to save on her RM1,800 salary, since the purchasing power of her salary is much lower than her father's back in the 1980s.
It is a fact that wages have not moved in tandem with the rise of the cost of living and inflation. That trend is expected to continue.
And if people do not start planning early for their retirement, they are going to find themselves in a spot after they turn 55.
Today, three meals cost you RM20 but in 20 years time – with an inflation rate of 6% a year – you will need RM64 per day for the three meals, estimates financial consultant Hazel Ong Archibald of CIMB Wealth Advisors (see Chart 1). The government puts inflation rate at 3.2% to 4.8% but Ong says in urban areas, that figure is about 6%.
So while the RM500,000 in your EPF or bank account at retirement might look good on paper, she says, if you do not invest that money to make it grow at a rate higher than the inflation rate, 20 years later, it would be worth only RM145,053 in purchasing power!
While there is more awareness about retirement planning these days, particularly in the urban areas, in reality this does not often translate into preparedness.
Why?
“Because it is more pleasurable to spend than to save,” opines Ong.
People understand – at head level – the need to plan and save, she says, but at heart level, emotions rule and instant gratification wins the battle.
“I wanted to persuade a friend to save for the future but she kept saying she had no money but then later I saw she could sign up RM3,000 and RM5,000 for some slimming packages!”
Reality hits when people find that they cannot afford to retire because they had not seriously put aside the money early on in life.
“Less than 5% are prepared for retirement,” estimates Life Insurance Association of Malaysia (LIAM) president Ng Lian Lau.
He says those in their 20s think they are too young to think about retirement, while those in their 30s and 40s tend to believe they are doing enough because they have their EPF savings, and those who are 55 feel it is just too late for them.
And the truth is at 55, most people cannot afford to retire.
“People are living longer, life expectancy for women is 76 years. For men it's 72. With this kind of longevity, people have got more than 20 years after retirement. 60 would be a more ideal retirement age,” he says.
People are marrying later too, points out Ong.
Which means they are having children later in life. If a person has a kid at the age of 35 and retires at 55, the odds are that his child at 20 would probably still be at university or college and his education require financing.
On average, the Malaysian household spent 5.7% on education last year. With the cost of education rising by 6% each year, this is expected to climb steadily.
While parents might buy an education insurance plan for their children, Ong has found that 90% of the time the amount is insufficient. More often than not, parents are willing to give up “everything”, including their own retirement fund for the kids. Which leaves them in a vulnerable position in their old age, unless of course their children provide for them.
As for life insurance, only 40% of Malaysians are covered. Ng says this is a small number compared to 100% in Singapore, 80% in the United States and 400% in Japan (where one person has four policies on average).
And even if one has a life policy as well as savings from the EPF, people should still worry about retirement. This is because without a new source of income, that money would run out. This is especially so if one runs into health problems which is common when people grow older.
“Medical inflation is easily 15% each year. And this could really eat into the savings,” warns Prudential Assurance Malaysia Bhd CEO Tan Kar Hor.
Tan likens the medical bill as a “hole” which if not plugged would leak away one's entire retirement and savings.
“It's only a question of how the big the hole is,” he says.
So parliamentary secretary to the Finance Ministry Datuk Seri Dr Hilmi Yahaya's announcement on Thursday that amendments to the Employees Provident Fund Act would allow contributors to withdraw money to buy insurance for critical illness for themselves and their family is welcome news. The amendment Bill was passed in Dewan Negara that same day.
So how much would one need for retirement?
Experts say this depends on the individual and his lifestyle. And how much he is willing to reduce consumption – to eat out less often, buy fewer things, live in a smaller house, drive less, drive a smaller car and travel less.
The rule of the thumb, says Ng, is managing on 60% of your last drawn pay.
For Ong, it's 70% of one's current lifestyle. If a family in Kuala Lumpur with two kids and two cars needs RM5,000 today, at retirement, expenses should go down to RM3,500.
Even based on this calculation, one would need RM747,000 if one were to live for 25 years after retirement, and RM806,200 for the next 30 years, factoring in the inflation and interest rates.
Going by statistics revealed in EPF's 2005 annual report, about 90% of EPF contributors have less than RM100,000 in their accounts. So sole dependence on one's EPF savings as a safety net is not good enough.
Assuming that one can live on RM1,000 a month, to survive for 25 years, one would still need a substantial RM300,000 and for 35 years, RM420,000.
Bank Negara's Counselling and Debt Management Agency (AKPK) CEO Mohamed Akwal Sultan reckons a person should not start purchasing big assets like property or a house late in life as the danger is that once they have retired they may not be able to meet the instalment payment on it.
“When you are in your late 40s, you should be winding down and not committing to high expenses to buy big things,” he says.
AKPK has dealt with a number of cases where retirees have had banks auction off their houses because they could not meet the monthly loan payment.
There is also the problem of credit card temptation. Ng notes a worrying trend that more and more younger people are becoming bankrupt as they are spending “tomorrow's money”. Which basically means these people are not saving or building their retirement nest.
Ideally, Ong says, people should start saving from the time of conception; that way would be able to enjoy the magic of the compounding effect (see Chart 2).
Prudential's Tan says a noticeable trend is that while the younger generation is prepared to invest in new financial instruments, the older generation gravitates towards fixed deposits.
“That is very risky because you would not be able to accumulate enough because the interest rates can't meet the inflationary rate and your money is getting smaller,” he says.
He believes given the current life span, it would do retirees good to be more aggressive in their investment.
“In investing, you should not be looking at the date of retirement but rather the date of potential death which is probably still another 21 years away after retirement,” he says.
He recommends that people only keep about six months of their monthly expenses in the savings and FDs and put the rest in investment products that generate more income than the inflation rate.
Ng believes a good private pension would help people in their retirement years. In developed countries, money put into savings for retirement is not taxable, neither is the profit from that investment.
“When you retire, you can't take the money out in a lump sum either or you'd have to pay tax on it. This will force you to withdraw your money on a regular monthly basis for retirement because that's tax free,” he adds.
Singapore has such a scheme, the voluntary Supplementary Retirement Scheme, which complements the Central Provident Fund (CPF). Such a scheme has not taken off in Malaysia for a number of reasons, says Ng.
It would be a loss of revenue to the Government because people would not be paying taxes on money put aside for retirement. It would benefit only the rich and middle income group as the poor might not be able to afford it, he adds.
“Perhaps it hasn't taken off too because the Malaysian economy is pretty dependent on consumer spending. And the Government wants you to spend,” he adds.
Ng says there should also be an asset liquidation law in the country. It is puzzling that there are all sorts of incentives for asset accumulation, he says, but none for liquidation.
An example of asset liquidation would be to reverse mortgage your house to the bank in return for a guaranteed monthly income until you die.
The asset would at the end of the day belong to the bank or insurance company. But in the meantime, the person has the right to continue to live in the house until death and get a monthly income too.
“If they outlive the value of the house, the bank loses,” he says.
As our population ages and life expectancy increases, more thought must be given by both individuals and the Government on how to develop a culture of planning and saving for one's retirement.
- Source from The Star, 27 May 2007 by Shahanaaz Habib.
Will Preparation
The purpose of making a will is to direct how the property of the deceased is to be distributed upon his or her death. There are certain formalities that need to be complied with. The will must be in writing and there must be two witnesses to its execution who must be present at the same time.
A person who is a beneficiary under a will ought not to be a witness. It is not that this will render the will invalid. Rather, the witness who is a beneficiary will lose his entitlement to inheritance under the will.
Of course, this discussion is in the context of a non-Muslim, though the considerations that need to be taken into account in making a will would be equally applicable in the case of Muslims.
Irrespective of who prepares the will, various aspects which lead to different consequences need to be considered.
Nor should a will be made by just copying someone else’s will or taking a template and changing the name of the testator, the name of the beneficiaries and description of the assets, whether in money or property.
The person preparing the will ought to find out from the testator whether he wants to give away his property in certain proportions, or whether he is bothered by certain possible contingencies.
The situation changes when the testator has serious concerns about providing for different members of his family. In this connection, there is a need to probe further in order to be able to give proper advice and guidance.
Sometimes the person who comes forward to make a will may think that the person who is drafting the will, will advise him. On the other hand, the person drafting the will may think the testator knows what he wants. As a result, a simple straightforward document may be prepared and the testator goes back believing that all is well.
The person preparing the will must enquire about the testator’s family circumstances in some detail. He must ask about the testator’s intentions and whether there are any concerns as to what may happen after his demise.
It is not a question of intruding into his privacy. Such inquiries are necessary in order to address problems which may arise in the future. In fact, knowledge of problems which have arisen in the past are matters that ought to be kept in mind and brought to the attention of the testator.
These eventualities and possibilities must be discussed and the testator should weigh the alternatives and consequences, and consider his options.
A situation could arise in which a person makes a will giving all his property to his only son whom he is very proud of. The son gets married and he in turn wills all his property to his wife.
On paper this looks fine. However, three months later the father dies, leaving the inheritance to his son. The son may have had the intention of looking after his mother but four months after his father’s death, he is killed in an accident.
At this point in time, based on the provisions of the will – and unless certain exceptions apply – the son’s wife may walk away with all the property and take the view that she no longer has any obligations or ties with the family to which her husband belonged.
- Source from The Star, 28 June 2011 by Bhag Singh.
A person who is a beneficiary under a will ought not to be a witness. It is not that this will render the will invalid. Rather, the witness who is a beneficiary will lose his entitlement to inheritance under the will.
Of course, this discussion is in the context of a non-Muslim, though the considerations that need to be taken into account in making a will would be equally applicable in the case of Muslims.
Irrespective of who prepares the will, various aspects which lead to different consequences need to be considered.
Nor should a will be made by just copying someone else’s will or taking a template and changing the name of the testator, the name of the beneficiaries and description of the assets, whether in money or property.
The person preparing the will ought to find out from the testator whether he wants to give away his property in certain proportions, or whether he is bothered by certain possible contingencies.
The situation changes when the testator has serious concerns about providing for different members of his family. In this connection, there is a need to probe further in order to be able to give proper advice and guidance.
Sometimes the person who comes forward to make a will may think that the person who is drafting the will, will advise him. On the other hand, the person drafting the will may think the testator knows what he wants. As a result, a simple straightforward document may be prepared and the testator goes back believing that all is well.
The person preparing the will must enquire about the testator’s family circumstances in some detail. He must ask about the testator’s intentions and whether there are any concerns as to what may happen after his demise.
It is not a question of intruding into his privacy. Such inquiries are necessary in order to address problems which may arise in the future. In fact, knowledge of problems which have arisen in the past are matters that ought to be kept in mind and brought to the attention of the testator.
These eventualities and possibilities must be discussed and the testator should weigh the alternatives and consequences, and consider his options.
A situation could arise in which a person makes a will giving all his property to his only son whom he is very proud of. The son gets married and he in turn wills all his property to his wife.
On paper this looks fine. However, three months later the father dies, leaving the inheritance to his son. The son may have had the intention of looking after his mother but four months after his father’s death, he is killed in an accident.
At this point in time, based on the provisions of the will – and unless certain exceptions apply – the son’s wife may walk away with all the property and take the view that she no longer has any obligations or ties with the family to which her husband belonged.
- Source from The Star, 28 June 2011 by Bhag Singh.
When The Money Is Tied Down
IT has been 10 years since Mei Leng’s mother died but she still has not been able to get the RM10,000 she had in a joint account with her.
It was one of those “either or” joint accounts where either Mei Leng or her mother could withdraw the money. Thus, neither had anticipated problems getting the money upon other’s demise.
“The money isn’t even much and none of my siblings want it anyway. In fact they have all agreed that the money should go to me and signed away their rights to it in a letter.
“But even with the letter, the bank won’t release the money unless all of us go together to the bank in Penang.
“This is difficult as we are all busy and working in different places. Some of us are in KL and some in Penang and it’s hard to get everyone together,” she says.
The problem is Mei Leng’s mother did not make a will and that their joint account did not have a survivorship clause. Without that clause, when one party passes away, the account gets frozen.
When Jasmine’s husband, Peter, died unexpectedly in 2008 leaving her with their two young children, as distraught as she was, she managed to rush to the bank to transfer the money from their joint account to her own personal account.
“I know it’s actually illegal but I didn’t want the money to be frozen for months while I waited for the letter of administration. My first thought was for the children,” she says.
Jasmine’s husband did not leave a will and it took her months to track down other personal bank accounts and shares that he owned.
She further endured another few months and spent RM5,000 in legal fees to get the letter of administration that entitled her and her children to the assets.
Their house was in their joint names. Jasmine was only able to transfer the house title to her name in Dec 2009, one-and-a-half years after her husband’s death.
Not wanting her children to go through the ordeal that she went through, Jasmine quickly got her own will written.
Since her children are still very young, she made sure the will was detailed. She named her brother as their guardian and made a trustee company the executor and trustee of her will.
Even her kids, who are both below five, have been informed on what to do if she dies. “I have a copy of my will in the cabinet. It’s in a red file, and a blue document. I even have mock exercises with the kids. I ask them ‘what do you do if I die?’ They will run to the cabinet, open it and get out the red file and take out the blue document in it. They know they are to hand it to their uncle (her brother). And they know too that the blue document is called ‘the will’.”
Jasmine’s father had a change of heart after watching the difficulties his daughter had to go through to get hold of her dead husband’s bank account and assets. He has transferred his three-storey shophouse to her youngest brother.
“My father has owned that property for 20 years and in the past he was reluctant to transfer it to us because he was afraid we might not take care of him in his old age.
“But Peter’s death shook him and he’s given it to my brother with a verbal agreement that my brother would look after him in his old age,” she says.
- Source from The Star, 21 February 2010 by Shahanaaz Habib.
It was one of those “either or” joint accounts where either Mei Leng or her mother could withdraw the money. Thus, neither had anticipated problems getting the money upon other’s demise.
“The money isn’t even much and none of my siblings want it anyway. In fact they have all agreed that the money should go to me and signed away their rights to it in a letter.
“But even with the letter, the bank won’t release the money unless all of us go together to the bank in Penang.
“This is difficult as we are all busy and working in different places. Some of us are in KL and some in Penang and it’s hard to get everyone together,” she says.
The problem is Mei Leng’s mother did not make a will and that their joint account did not have a survivorship clause. Without that clause, when one party passes away, the account gets frozen.
When Jasmine’s husband, Peter, died unexpectedly in 2008 leaving her with their two young children, as distraught as she was, she managed to rush to the bank to transfer the money from their joint account to her own personal account.
“I know it’s actually illegal but I didn’t want the money to be frozen for months while I waited for the letter of administration. My first thought was for the children,” she says.
Jasmine’s husband did not leave a will and it took her months to track down other personal bank accounts and shares that he owned.
She further endured another few months and spent RM5,000 in legal fees to get the letter of administration that entitled her and her children to the assets.
Their house was in their joint names. Jasmine was only able to transfer the house title to her name in Dec 2009, one-and-a-half years after her husband’s death.
Not wanting her children to go through the ordeal that she went through, Jasmine quickly got her own will written.
Since her children are still very young, she made sure the will was detailed. She named her brother as their guardian and made a trustee company the executor and trustee of her will.
Even her kids, who are both below five, have been informed on what to do if she dies. “I have a copy of my will in the cabinet. It’s in a red file, and a blue document. I even have mock exercises with the kids. I ask them ‘what do you do if I die?’ They will run to the cabinet, open it and get out the red file and take out the blue document in it. They know they are to hand it to their uncle (her brother). And they know too that the blue document is called ‘the will’.”
Jasmine’s father had a change of heart after watching the difficulties his daughter had to go through to get hold of her dead husband’s bank account and assets. He has transferred his three-storey shophouse to her youngest brother.
“My father has owned that property for 20 years and in the past he was reluctant to transfer it to us because he was afraid we might not take care of him in his old age.
“But Peter’s death shook him and he’s given it to my brother with a verbal agreement that my brother would look after him in his old age,” she says.
- Source from The Star, 21 February 2010 by Shahanaaz Habib.
Unclaimed Monies stand at RM4.53bil
PETALING JAYA: The total amount of unclaimed monies in the country stands at RM4.53bil, Deputy Finance Minister Datuk Dr Awang Adek Hussein said.
The monies include dividends, insurance claims, deposits and bank drafts.
He added that the owners and inheritors of these monies might not be aware of the existence of the funds and could make enquiries at the nearest branches of Bank Negara and submit claims.
“If the monies are not claimed within the stipulated period, the Government may borrow it for development purposes for the benefit of the people,” he said when contacted yesterday.
Awang Adek said the Government has over the years used the unclaimed funds for public expenditures.
Referring to official figures by the Accountant-General’s Department, Dr Awang Adek said from 1977 to 1996, RM653mil of such funds have been used for various public programmes.
According to the Unclaimed Monies Act 1965, unclaimed monies are those which are legally payable to the owner but have remained unpaid for a period of not less than one year.
This include money credited into a trading or a personal account which has been inactive for more than two and seven years respectively.
Dr Awang Adek said the next-of-kin or the children of some of the deceased depositors did not even know about the money that was left behind.
Some of the these monies were left in the Employees Provident Fund or in the banks, he added.
- Source from The Star, 21 February 2011.
The monies include dividends, insurance claims, deposits and bank drafts.
He added that the owners and inheritors of these monies might not be aware of the existence of the funds and could make enquiries at the nearest branches of Bank Negara and submit claims.
“If the monies are not claimed within the stipulated period, the Government may borrow it for development purposes for the benefit of the people,” he said when contacted yesterday.
Awang Adek said the Government has over the years used the unclaimed funds for public expenditures.
Referring to official figures by the Accountant-General’s Department, Dr Awang Adek said from 1977 to 1996, RM653mil of such funds have been used for various public programmes.
According to the Unclaimed Monies Act 1965, unclaimed monies are those which are legally payable to the owner but have remained unpaid for a period of not less than one year.
This include money credited into a trading or a personal account which has been inactive for more than two and seven years respectively.
Dr Awang Adek said the next-of-kin or the children of some of the deceased depositors did not even know about the money that was left behind.
Some of the these monies were left in the Employees Provident Fund or in the banks, he added.
- Source from The Star, 21 February 2011.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





















